Devon, that made me laugh. i hope you don't really think you just revealed 'the best piece of actuarial exam advice you are ever likely to receive'! Your last couple of sentences were perfectly sensible, but i really don't think the rest of it would be good advice for most people. Approximately seems to have a much more balanced sensible approach. For example:
(i) You seem to suggest you should attempt the easiest questions when your concentration is at its peak, so presumably you suggest attempting the hardest at the end, (when its probably at it lowest). That may sometimes be the best strategy, but it clearly could also be a pretty bad strategy, especially if you're likely to have enough time to make at least a reasonable attempt at each question within the 3 hours (as is the case for most exams). E.g. Sonnyshock's experience is a good example of how someone has found a strategy that works for them by attempting the hardest questions in the middle of the exam!
(ii) "if your pen is not in contact with the page you are not earning marks". Whilst literally true, this seems to be contradicting what is generally accepted to be good exam technique. You seem to be advocating a strategy of trying to maximise the rate at which you score marks constantly during the exam, but this is not the best way to maximise your total marks scored at the end of the 3 hours, which should be your objective. In my experience, this is the easiest trap to fall in to, and i'd suspect this is a common reason for people failing exams. If you want to score maximum marks (i.e. your maximum), you'll probably need to put your pen down at least a few times during the exam (or at least make notes on scrap paper) and spend some time brainstorming/planning/structuring your answer. Its a 3 hour marathon, not 180 one minute sprints, so your strategy should reflect that.
(iii) this is probably stating the obvious, but the advantage of just working through the paper and tackling the questions in the order they appear in the paper is that it avoids wasting time (a) reading through the whole paper before you start in order to identify the easiest marks, and (b) jumping between different parts of different questions in order to tackle them in a strict 'easiest first' order (as devon seems to advocate), which is likely to involve re-reading questions etc. I'd guess some compromise between the two extremes is likely to work best for most people, as Vicki seemed to suggest.