• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.
M

Mbotha

Member
Can AWP products also be written on either a 90/10 (no explicit charging structure) or 0/100 (explicit charging structure) basis? And if so, I'm assuming that (ch20) section 4's asset share calculation methods also apply to AWP.

In the case of a mutual, am I right in saying that the matter of 90/10 or 0/100 doesn't apply because there are no shareholders to whom transfers can accrue? Or does it apply and the "shareholder surplus" just accrues to the estate?
 
Can AWP products also be written on either a 90/10 (no explicit charging structure) or 0/100 (explicit charging structure) basis?

Yes. Although UWP is the most common form of AWP, in principle non-unitised AWP products can be either 90/10 or 0/100.

In the case of a mutual, am I right in saying that the matter of 90/10 or 0/100 doesn't apply because there are no shareholders to whom transfers can accrue?

Broadly, yes can assume this doesn't apply and that all surplus arising belongs to the (100% policyholder owned) WP fund.

Best wishes
Lynn
 
Back
Top