Thomasb
Indeed, but a systematic bank failure is a non linear process and occurs with positive feedback.
The problem is a lot more international than I envisaged in January. The process began in America, with falling prices, keys being handed back, auctions dragging prices down, creating negative equity, mortgage broker/savings and loans failure
....the rest looks like an odds on proposition. I stated the probability as 5-10 % in January. I would up that to 55%. This means there is still a 45% chance I will be proved wrong. However the consequences of being proved right, will probably be dire, the consequences of being proved wrong are not that serious. This makes it a very asymmetrical outcome and thus one that sensible people will prepare for
The point here is not that I have been proved right, but that Phil dismissed the possibility - a very dangerous trait in someone who wishes to be a finance professional
Last edited by a moderator: Sep 14, 2007