A
abcdefg
Member
For the non unit reserves there is the method of zeroising cashflows to calculate the reserve. Why is this approach used rather than taking the net present value of the future cashflows by discounting each one at the appropriate discount rate? Does zeroising cashflows result in a lower reserve being held?
I am also trying to understand why this method is not used for without profits policies. I thought it might be because non unit fund cashflows are less smooth and predictable (e.g. charges depend on unit fund size). But I assume that unit reserves need to be projected in an approximate manner with assumed asset growth rates and premiums received so the cashflows are estimated to be smoother than they really are, so the non unit reserves would also project in a smoother manner than they would in reality.
If so, then why isn't the same zeroising method used for a without profits contract e.g. a complicated one where a cashflow method is necessary.
I am also trying to understand why this method is not used for without profits policies. I thought it might be because non unit fund cashflows are less smooth and predictable (e.g. charges depend on unit fund size). But I assume that unit reserves need to be projected in an approximate manner with assumed asset growth rates and premiums received so the cashflows are estimated to be smoother than they really are, so the non unit reserves would also project in a smoother manner than they would in reality.
If so, then why isn't the same zeroising method used for a without profits contract e.g. a complicated one where a cashflow method is necessary.