M
Missannuity
Member
I'm a bit confused by the concepts of 90/10 and 0/100 funds, especially for UWP where there may be an explicit charging structure.
For CWP, it's usually 90/10, so policyholders receive 90% of surplus and shareholders 10%. I presume this covers all sources of surplus (investment, expense etc)?
For UWP, chapter 23 says that the structure can be either 90/10 with no explicit charging structure (which I presume is the same as the CWP case above?). Or instead, policyholders can receive all of the investment surplus through bonuses, and shareholders receive all other sources of surplus via an explicit charging structure.
What is meant by an explicit charging structure? And why in this case do we separate the investment surplus from other sources of surplus? The second case is not a 0/100 fund?
Thanks
For CWP, it's usually 90/10, so policyholders receive 90% of surplus and shareholders 10%. I presume this covers all sources of surplus (investment, expense etc)?
For UWP, chapter 23 says that the structure can be either 90/10 with no explicit charging structure (which I presume is the same as the CWP case above?). Or instead, policyholders can receive all of the investment surplus through bonuses, and shareholders receive all other sources of surplus via an explicit charging structure.
What is meant by an explicit charging structure? And why in this case do we separate the investment surplus from other sources of surplus? The second case is not a 0/100 fund?
Thanks