• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Vintage approach and shadow unit approach

S

Sponge

Member
I'm going o we the notes on surplus distribution for awp products. Vintage approach and shadow unit approach are mentioned. I can't quite understand what the vintage approach is doing?
 
I'm going o we the notes on surplus distribution for awp products. Vintage approach and shadow unit approach are mentioned. I can't quite understand what the vintage approach is doing?
The vintage approach removes the need to calculate the asset share for each policy.

We start by looking at a single premium contract sold in 1990 and maturing today and work out a suitable terminal bonus rate. We then calculate a suitable TB for a single premium contract sold in 1991. We continue in this way to work out a suitable TB rate for contracts sold in every year, finishing with a contract sold this year and maturing this year (yes I know this is unlikely, but we can model a hypothetical policy with the investment returns over the life of the contract and calculate a suitable TB rate).

Then we can apply these TB rates to any policies maturing this year. So if we have a policy which paid a premium of 200 in 1990, 400 in 1991, 300 in 1992, and then was made paid up, then we can apply the appropriate TB rates for the 1990, 1991 and 1992 vintages to the premiums of 200, 400 and 300 respectively. We then know the payout without needing to know the asset share.

Best wishes

Mark
 
Back
Top