VaR is the minimum amount (it's a lower bound) you will lose if you have a bad day. Tail-VaR is the expectation of the amount you will lose *given* you are having a bad day. Excess Tail VaR is the expected difference between Tail VaR and VaR. I am not 100% certain without checking, but I think I am correct in saying that excess tail VaR is not equal to tail VaR minus VaR.
Correct. Well spotted. Have to admit I'm not sure about the intellectual coherence of a measure of an expected value under two different filtrations...but who ever said VaR made sense?
Not quite sure I understand what you mean by "two different filtrations." X-TVaR is certainly not coherent in the formal sense.