• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

VAP/Multivariate Time Series

A

ActAus

Member
Hi all,

I'm not sure if someone has asked questions regarding expressing a univariate time series into a multivariate vector form (turning a AP(p) into a VAP(1)), or if there is a general rule about it.

My question specifically is how we know how many rows of the matrix to write when turning a AP(2) into a VAP(1). For example, the example the Notes (bottom of p45 of Ch13 under the heading "Multivariate time series"). In this example, there are 3 rows (Xt, Xt-1, Xt-2)T in the matrix. However, in an assignment question Q4.13 part (iii) Xn = 0.7Xn-1 - 0.1Xn-2 + en, the solution shows there are only 2 rows (Xn, Xn-1)T in the matrix. They are both AR(2), yet one VAP(1) has 3 rows and the other 2 rows. Is there a general rule of how many rows of matrix or both expressions are valid??

My second question is how does the matrix under the heading "Multivariate time series" (again bottom of p45 of Ch13) show that it is a vector in the form of Xt = AXt-1 + Bet. More specifically, where we do get the "Xt-1" part from (the matrix above)?

Thanks.
 
Yeah. I see the issue. The summary (Ch13 p45) is an ARMA not an AR and that is the difference between the 2 questions. The approach for the AR one in the assignment is what I would do.

For the ARMA I can see the logic (so we have corresponding terms in the X and e vectors on the RHS) but you could also write it as:

\(\pmatrix{X_t \\ X_{t-1}} = \pmatrix{\alpha_1 & \alpha_2 \\ 1 & 0} \pmatrix{X_{t-1} \\ X_{t-2}} + \pmatrix{1 & \beta \\ 0 & 0} \pmatrix{e_t \\ e_{t-1}} \)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top