Uwp?!

Discussion in 'SP2' started by psychopath 0_o, Aug 27, 2011.

  1. I am so confused about accumulating with profit.

    In CR it describes mainly UWP, which is fine. But why a UWP will be non-unitised?

    What are the differences, in layman term, between a non-unitised UWP policy and a CWP policy???
     
  2. PoojaS

    PoojaS Member


    In both the differences are mainly of structure which leads to differences in source of surplus distributed:

    1. UWP without any explicit charging structure: is a lot like CWP. Under this bonuses will reflect policyholders share of all the surplus.

    2. UWP with a explicit charging structure: P/hs receive all investment surplus and s/hs receive rest through use of explicit charging structure.
    Explicitly deducted charges from the premiums (or unit fund), like:
    - Allocation rate
    - FMC
    - policy fee
    - risk charge deductions say for mortality benefit

    3. In general the bonuses under UWP are more volatile than CWP
    - Often p/h just participating in investment surplus so can reasonably expect stronger corrlation between investment return and declared regular bonus.
    - Bonus applied to unit fund rather than sum assured so p/h views it a bit like a bank account and expects to see something like actual returns applied annually.

    That's some I can think about....

    Cheers
    P
     

Share This Page