• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Time Series definition question

E

Ex-muso

Member
Hi

Purely indeterministic (PI) is defined in the CH12 summary as meaning that knowledge of earlier values of X is progressively less useful at predicting the value of X(subscript N) as N tends to infinity.

I don't currently see how this fits with the white noise definition and the given fact that white noise is purely indeterministic.

Isn't it the case that for white noise knowledge of earlier values of X is equally "useful" (ie not useful at all), regardless of how large N becomes?

If that's right, should the PI definition read "progressively less useful, or no more useful". Or something like that.

Far more likely is that I've missed something - please help!
 
Purely indeterministic basically means that Cov(Xt, Xt+k) gets smaller as the lag k gets bigger.

In a trivial case, let's consider an MA(1): Xt=et+et-1.

Cov(Xt,Xt)=2(sigma squared)
Cov(Xt, Xt-1)=sigma squared
Cov(Xt, Xt-2)=0 (and in fact the covariance will always be 0 for lags greater than 1)


So you can see, as the lag inreased, the covariance decreased.

In the most extreme trivial case, let's consider Xt=et. (So we're only worrying about one term of white noise, as you do in your question.)

Cov(Xt,Xt)=sigma squared
Cov(Xt, Xt-1)=0

So again, the covariance has decreased as the lag increased from 0 to 1.
 
Dear Catherine
can u please explain question 4.13 of ct 6 Q&A
 
The question does not ask you to find that. Indeed it would not be possible without a plot of he PACF.
 
Back
Top