• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

The most difficult ST course of them all

Of what you have heard or attempted, which is the most difficult ST of them all?

  • ST1 Health and Care

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • ST2 Life Insurance

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • ST3 General Insurance

    Votes: 10 41.7%
  • ST4 Pensions

    Votes: 3 12.5%
  • ST5 Finance

    Votes: 2 8.3%
  • ST6 Investment

    Votes: 9 37.5%

  • Total voters
    24
D

Dukerio

Member
Vote for your choice and comment on why you feel that ST course is difficult

I feel that possibly different courses may be difficult to different people, depending on your interests and your current work area
 
Hmmmmm I'd say ST6.

General was hard when I wrote it (as a 300 paper), not because the course material was hard, but because you never knew what the examiners wanted - eg when doing past papers you'd list certain things as the 'most important' and they'd list others, or your 'list' would be four detailed points and theirs 16 bullets, and the next time yours would be 16 bullets and theirs four detailed points!

ST6 has very 'buggy' notes which annoyed me no end, and not helped by having two books now all of which use different approaches and/or notation. Also the knowledge was skimmed over in places, and to the pure mathematician the heuristics would have given them a heart attack..... :D And the examiner and ActEd seemed to have vastly different ideas of what the syllabus was actually after. It seems to be settling down a bit now, to be fair.
 
Hmmmmm I'd say ST6.

General was hard when I wrote it (as a 300 paper), not because the course material was hard, but because you never knew what the examiners wanted - eg when doing past papers you'd list certain things as the 'most important' and they'd list others, or your 'list' would be four detailed points and theirs 16 bullets, and the next time yours would be 16 bullets and theirs four detailed points!

ST6 has very 'buggy' notes which annoyed me no end, and not helped by having two books now all of which use different approaches and/or notation. Also the knowledge was skimmed over in places, and to the pure mathematician the heuristics would have given them a heart attack..... :D And the examiner and ActEd seemed to have vastly different ideas of what the syllabus was actually after. It seems to be settling down a bit now, to be fair.

I'd say ST3 - I passed on my fifth attempt!!!!
 
Wow, great determination

My first impression was that you are a member of the Faculty and you were 'forced' to do general, because I heard that the Faculty had such a rule for all student members about a decade ago

Really? News to me :)

I joined 200-and-something, and had no rules like that. Joined before the work experience requirement as well....
 
the rules you are referring to were
between 1999 and 2003, you had to sit papers in all 4 specialisms:

301 (investment) 302(life) 303(general) and 304 (pensions),
so this is why you had to take general to qualify.
 
From personal experience ST6 was a real pig. Not necessarily because of the subject content (although very technical) but mostly due to a very poor set of ActEd notes (sorry ActEd - but true!) and subsequently introduction of a couple of text books. I.e. not a properly integrated set of notes like every other subject. Also most exam questions bore little resemblance to anything in the assignments/Q&A bank/mock exams/past CiD papers, so it was really hard to know what to expect in the first few sittings of this paper.

Also, to back my claim, an overall pass rate of 31.5% in ST6 since the new diet was introduced. This is the worst of all ST subjects, with ST3 having a comparatively healthy 38.8%.

Of course, it is hard to be objective, since we only get exposed to a couple of these courses, but you do wonder if some are 'easier' than others - ST1 has a pass rate of 48.3%, by far and away the highest rate of all ST subjects. Surely the candidates should be of a similar quality across all these subjects, with a fairly uniform pass rate?
 
Somebody (sad) once told me that they'd statistically analysed the historical pass rates of the ST exams and that ST3 wasn't significantly lower than the others. But of course pass rates don't necessarily reflect the difficulty of the exam or material (selection effect, etc).

Don't know about ST6 though, wasn't one of my chosen subjects. But I vaguely recall the notes being changed significantly recently to address the differences between the syllabus and the exam?
 
yes, changed significantly, by making you buy two textbooks!
 
Back
Top