• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Term assurance reserves

J

Jimmy white

Member
The examiner report for September 2007 q5 (i) says on term assurance business: "this may not be significant for this contract due to the low reserves"

I would have thought that term assurance business would have a high reserving requirement relative to the amount of premium paid, given that a a small amount if prudence in the mortality assumption relative to the pricing assumption would greatly increase the expected benefit payouts. Am
I wrong?

Consequently the biggest driver of embedded value would be the release of reserves over the run-off of the business

Thanks
 
Reserves are money you put aside to pay for future benefits and expenses (minus future premiums).

If, for example, you're part way through a 10-year term assurance, how much money would you need to hold for future benefits, given the small chance of death within the term? Not much at all!
 
Reserves are money you put aside to pay for future benefits and expenses (minus future premiums).

If, for example, you're part way through a 10-year term assurance, how much money would you need to hold for future benefits, given the small chance of death within the term? Not much at all!

At outset though you will be receiving a relatively low regular premium, the benefit will be extremely high but the probably of payout will be low. Given the margins for prudence in the reserving assumption I thought that the reserves held relative to the premiums paid, particularly at outset would have been quite high. Relative the expected payout would be down to the strength of the margins in the reserving basis
 
Quick level term assurance example (ignoring expenses and profit):

AM92 Select Mortality
Sum assured = £10,000
Age at entry = 50
Term = 10 years

Premium basis interest rate = 6%
Reserving basis interest rate = 4%

Annual premium = £38.92
Time 0 reserves = £19.17

So the reserves are actually only half of the first years premium, and as you can see they are very low. That's assuming that I haven't made any mistakes in my calculations!
 
Back
Top