• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Tail Dependence

B

bajajrishav

Member
I have a doubt regarding tail dependence. Which Tail dependence ( upper or lower) will be more appropriate in measuring credit risk and why?

Also, except to that to find the correlation between extreme events in the tail what are other importance of tail dependence?

Thanks
 
You need to be clear about what is being measured before thinking about possible tail dependencies.

Take default risk & consider corporate bonds as an example....

If we are looking at different tranches of debt issued by a single company and are modelling the time to default, then we might observe a high level of upper tail dependence because if one of the bonds defaults late in its term then the other is also likely to be defaulting late in its term.

However, if we are looking at the returns on various corporate bonds issued by companies in different sectors it may be that there is a low level of upper tail dependence (high returns on one of the bonds is not necessarily associated with higher returns on the other, due to the diversification of credit risks in normal markets) but a high level of lower tail dependence (as in extreme markets all bonds may well suffer at the same time).

So... it depends!

Be careful... correlation (Pearson's) is not the same as dependence!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here is the question from a CERA past paper and I was too confused reading both the answer.!

State whether lower or upper tail dependence is more relevant to credit
default risk, and explain why.


The asset return depends on sensitivity to one or more systematic
(correlated) risks as well as one firm-specific (uncorrelated) risk.
If a bad state of the world (increased systematic risk) leads to default for a
particular asset, other assets are more likely to default as well, assuming
they have a similar sensitivity to systematic risk.
Therefore, credit default risk exhibits high lower tail dependence.

In a good state of the world, systematic risk has little impact and the asset
return is mostly affected by uncorrelated firm-specific risk.
Independent or uncorrelated variables have no tail dependence.
As such, credit default risk exhibits low upper tail dependence


Can u please justify???
" http://www.soa.org/files/pdf/edu-2011-04-afe-sol.pdf "
 
Urgent

Anyone please reply because I have my exam on the 17th of August. University's exam.

Thanks
 
Back
Top