ahtohallan
Keen member
Hi there
When investigating the supportability of RBs Ch 19, section 5.3 - I am confused by the asset value used to compare to the gross premium valuation
The notes refer to a realistic asset value (MV) comparison to the gross premium valuation.
But also says: "Aggregate earned asset shares would usually be used to compare to the liabilities...".
In this context is the asset share being treated as an alternative to asset? Or is this a second comparison (GPV compared to Aggregate AS).
Any guidance would be appreciated
When investigating the supportability of RBs Ch 19, section 5.3 - I am confused by the asset value used to compare to the gross premium valuation
The notes refer to a realistic asset value (MV) comparison to the gross premium valuation.
But also says: "Aggregate earned asset shares would usually be used to compare to the liabilities...".
In this context is the asset share being treated as an alternative to asset? Or is this a second comparison (GPV compared to Aggregate AS).
Any guidance would be appreciated