• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Stochastic vs Deterministic Approach

Yash A

Member
In chapter 14, Models(1), it is mentioned that positive liability will be calculated if stochastic method is used whereas deterministic method would produce zero liability (eg costing guarantees and options).

Why is this the case?
 
In chapter 14, Models(1), it is mentioned that positive liability will be calculated if stochastic method is used whereas deterministic method would produce zero liability (eg costing guarantees and options).

Why is this the case?
Hi Yash

The following example might help.

Let's say that interest rates are 5% pa today. An insurer decides to sell a unit-linked contract with a guaranteed return of 1% pa.

If a deterministic model is used then the insurer might value the option at a prudent rate, let's say 2% (as this is much lower than the current 5% interest rate). This would give the option a value of zero as the contract is assumed to earn more than the guarantee.

If a stochastic model is used then many simulations will be performed. Most of these simulations will use an interest rate bigger than 1% and so again place a value of zero on the guarantee. But at least some of the simulations will use an interest rate lower than 1% to give the guarantee a positive value.

Best wishes

Mark
 
Back
Top