• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

ST7 September 2012 Q6 - Insurable Risks

R

RedCoat

Member
This question is a fairly standard one, with part (i) asking about conditions for a risk to be insurable and then (ii) giving two proposed insurance arrangements and asking for comments on whether they fit the criteria.

One of these is a school which is holding a game at a fundraising event. For £10 entry you roll six dice and if you get all 6s then you win £25k, nothing otherwise. They want insuring to indemnify them for the £25k prize.

In the examiner's report it says firstly (as a mark) "The school does have an interest in the risk because they will have to pay if someone rolls six sixes". This relates to the criteria that the insured must have an interest in the risk, to distinguish from gambling. When I attempted the question I thought that this wasn't really the case - once insured the school doesn't really care either way since it has no cost to them, and they may in fact want someone to win for the publicity!

In the comments beneath the mark scheme the examiners said "A large number said that the school did not have an interest in the insured event, even when they stated in (i) that this was to distinguish insurance from gambling, because if it was insured they made no loss if someone won.".

So at least I wasn't alone in thinking this! But could someone please clarify why it isn't the case? I don't want to make the same mistake again. I feel like I understand the principle generally - people don't want to crash their cars even if insured because they might injure themselves, don't want to make claims on contents insurance because their premiums will rise in future etc. But this seems like a one off event with no harm for the school if someone wins?
 
The point is that you must have an interest in the risk before the purchase of insurance. The school definitely has an interest in that case because if someone wins the prize they will have to pay it out.
 
Back
Top