• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

ST6 Sept 06 Q3ii)

L

Louisa

Member
On the off chance I'm not the only one doing last minute past papers...

I can't follow the examiners' solution to Q3ii). They seem to be worried about correlation between 1-year and 5-year ZCB rates. What 1-year rate is that? The only one I was using was the one at time 0 which is known.

Unlikely I know, but if anyone should happen to look at it this evening and knows the answer it would be much appreciated!
L
ETA: Hull p615
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That was one of the questions which is contributing to putting me off ST6 exams...

Anyway, the ActEd solution gave the direct use of Black's model, which is what I went for and is, as ActEd pointed out, the official solution (I wonder if it would have gained any marks in the exam though). What the examiner is trying to say, as I understand it, is that the value now of the 5-yr bond is directly linked to the 5-yr spot rate of interest; and to value the option on a risk neutral basis (which the Black's model uses), you have to use a discount factor based on the 1-year spot rate (since the option matures in 1 year's time); this is the ZCB rate the examiner's referring to. But because the two rates are correlated, if we just changed the underlying in the BS model from a share to a bond, the volatility wouldn't be correct if we just used the one as applicable to the 5-yr rate; therefore we must use a modified version which takes into account of the correlation between the two rates in order for this to work.

I hope that might help a little...
 
Thankyou very much - i did catch this this morning and it was most reassuring, as I did use the Black model for that question.
L
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top