So people - back again analysing the questions and seeing how people thought it went. All in all a fair paper - for a change there were no errors and no questions that were asking for an erroneous amount of calculations for 1 mark. But as is the way in these exams it never maters how fair the paper is it always hinges on wishing everyone else made a mistake somewhere.......so nay thoughts on questions that may have stumped a few people?
feedback Yeah,I also thought the paper was quite fair. None of those impossible questions I saw in previous papers. Q4 did get me though,my VAR was negative which I just couldn't get to work. Overall there semmed to be little straight theory which you know wheher you got it right or not.Q5-8 asked you to give your opinion on matters but i wondered afterwards whether there was a single correct answer. It felt like you could probably say anything really,provided you gave sufficient support to your arguments?
