The ST3 Core Reading is based primarily on the 303 Core Reading. There are always a few tweaks from year to year but the underlying principles are still the same.
As you know we have inherited some material from Subject 106. Two big chapters (on Ruin Theory and Credibility Theory) and one small chapter on Aggregate Claims Distributions. Theoretically, it's all examinable and any old 106 question on this topic would be fair game.
However, if the past is a good guide to the future!!! then so far we've had:
in apr 05: a small numerical application of ruin theory
in sept 05: ditto
in apr 06: nothing.
I think students found these two questions quite tricky (as they were not typical 106 questions) but to be honest they weren't too bad if you understood the principles (sorry to anyone who found them tough, I didn't have to do them under exam condition in 10 mins).
But it looks as though they are more likely to examine the application of the results than proofs and derivations - but I can't promise!
Also, I think that a lot of the proofs are being taken out of the Core Reading for the 2007 exams - but yet to be confirmed.
Reserving is still the biggest topic. Many students don't like accounts - although the numerical part of the latest accounts question looks OK (although someone mentioned time pressure). The wordy bits either side of it look more tricky.
So is ST3 just as easy as 303 Yes pretty much. The pass rate has crept up a little but the April exam looks quite tough (very little bookwork), and I wouldn't be surprised if it's low this time - but fingers crossed they drop the pass mark and let lots through (including LouiseF).
Last edited by a moderator: May 19, 2006