• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Splitting Endowment Assurances

J

jensen

Member
Hi

Can we split endowment assurances like how we split term assurances?

Example for term n assurances;

Ax (term n) = Ax (term t) + v^t . t_P_x . Ax+t (term n-t)


Can we do the same for endowment / pure endowments? Or is the best way is to use annuity functions, then convert back using premium conversion formula?

Thanks!!
 
Yes you can split them... But don't make life difficult unless there'sa specific reason like you have different assumptions over time.
 
Yes you can split them... But don't make life difficult unless there'sa specific reason like you have different assumptions over time.

Yes, I have different assumptions thats why.

Back to the question, so when we split the endowment assurance, is the first part also an endowment assurance, or is it just a term insurance since the maturity benefit pertains only to the end of the period?
 
Yes the first bit is a term. Think of an endowment as a term plus a pure endowment, then split each of these as necessary, to get the concept and try to find the easiest way to get there.
 
Thanks didster.

If you don't mind looking, here is what's bothering me.

There is two set of assumption for interest rates; 4% for age up to 55 and 5% thereafter.

I'm trying to split the endowment assurance using what I understand but I can't match the final answer to the solution. The solution used the annuity functions instead.

The difference is 5%, so it can't be mere rounding error.
 
Without looking at any of the numbers, I'd say the last line of the "However" solution is incorrect as it uses d = 0.04/1.04, where you have different interest rates (ie not 4%) applying.
Want to quote source of solution?
 
Thanks didster.

It made sense to me though, coz it's 4% up to age 55, and 5% thereafter.

It's actually assignment question X2.5 on my 2009 notes, and I am not sure if there is any correction. So embarrassed if there was.:p
 
Back
Top