• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Sorting out formulae for St

N

nicolathompson

Member
Hi, I’ve been trying to sort out all the formulae / distributions in my head and have found the following 6 at various places in the notes. Am confused by the last two...

1. dSt = St(µdt + σdZt) under P (basic definition of Geometric Brownian motion)
2. dSt = St(rdt + σdZtildat) under Q (Chapter 15, p18)


3. St = Soexp[(µ-σ2/2)t + σZt] under P (basic definition of Geometric Brownian motion)
4. St = Soexp[(r-σ2/2)t + σZtildat] under Q (comes from using C-M-G theorem, chapter 14, p12)


Then why do these not match the same way (replace µ by r and Z by Ztilda)?

5. ln[(St+dt/St] has N(µdt, σ2dt) under P (Chapter 9)
6. ln[(St+dt/St] has N((r-σ2/2)dt, σ2dt) under Q (Calibrating binomial models, chapter 12)
 
Hi again Nicola

Em 5 ? where did that come from its not true sure its not , we can get 5 from 3 by divide across by S zero then taking logs. (and a bit of fooling around with the times t , t zero.)

likewise for 6 can be got from 4 in the same fashion.

So you can in fact always replace mu with r and z with zTilda.

But whats that i hear you ask , why oh why , is the variances both sigma squared dt in 5 and 6 ????

well this is cause we are changing the drift but not the volatility of our Brownian motion when we shift to the EMM q .
So our variance in both cases is the same sigma squared dt

how do we work out this variance
well it comes from the fact that

::EDIT :: integral sigma dBs

is a random variable that is normal distributed with mean zero and variance given by

integral sigma squared dt

this is the variance that appears in 5 and 6.

Hope this is understandable and the correct way to think about it cause I am by no means a pro at this .
Good luck in your exam.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for reminding me that you can change the drift but not the volatility when we shift from P to Q (I had never really got what they were going on about when that was mentioned in the C-M-G theorem).

So are 5 and 6 both correct then?
I got 5 from:
log(Su) - log(St) is N with mean mu(u-t) and volatility sigma-squared*(u-t)
which I believe is the same thing as my no.5

I got 6 from the proof of calibrating binomial models.

Good luck too! I have a few long evenings of study to do!
 
Back
Top