• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Smoothing

Helloall

Very Active Member
Hi,

I was wondering whether you could perhaps explain a component of smoothing to me.

I understand that an individual who takes out a with profits contract will experience smoothing e.g. actual returns in first 3 years are 5%, 10%, 6% whilst regularly revisionary bonuses are say 5%, 5% and 5%.

I also understand that at the end of the contract you pay a terminal bonus in order to payback the rest of the earned asset share on the contract i.e. you are trying to pay asset share to the policyholder.

What i don't understand is that in certain past papers it implies that the asset share is not always paid out and an average asset share is paid out e.g. at maturity sometimes a policyholder will receive more than the asset share and sometimes they will receive less. Why does the terminal bonus not just mean that they receive the asset share. Is it because you are not performing these calculations on a per policy basis and doing it on groups of policies?
 
Hi,

I was wondering whether you could perhaps explain a component of smoothing to me.

I understand that an individual who takes out a with profits contract will experience smoothing e.g. actual returns in first 3 years are 5%, 10%, 6% whilst regularly revisionary bonuses are say 5%, 5% and 5%.

I also understand that at the end of the contract you pay a terminal bonus in order to payback the rest of the earned asset share on the contract i.e. you are trying to pay asset share to the policyholder.

What i don't understand is that in certain past papers it implies that the asset share is not always paid out and an average asset share is paid out e.g. at maturity sometimes a policyholder will receive more than the asset share and sometimes they will receive less. Why does the terminal bonus not just mean that they receive the asset share. Is it because you are not performing these calculations on a per policy basis and doing it on groups of policies?
Your understanding above is all correct. So we have two types of smoothing: smoothing regular bonuses and smoothing payouts. If with-profits policies just paid out exactly the asset share then there wouldn't really be much difference between with-profits and unit-linked. So smoothing the maturity payout is a fundamental feature of with-profits. Yes, sometimes an element of smoothing is introduced by setting terminal bonuses for groups of policies rather than considering individual asset shares. But even companies that calculate individual asset shares might smooth these to calculate the payout.

Best wishes

Mark
 
Back
Top