• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Should Calendar Year be Included in CAT Models

E

Entact30

Member
My view is that we should not fit Calendar Year in a CAT model unless we are aware of a genuine calendar year effect such as a change to policy terms and conditions or some other change we know will affect frequency and severity. My reasoning is as follows:

• The data is likelyy to consist of a small number of CAT events over, say, a ten year period corresponding to a particular peril (e.g. flood) and number of events (e.g. 4 events)
• Say the CATs will have occurred in 4 out of the 10 years
• The differences in the Cat events are likely to be down to a difference in the risk profile of policies where the CAT events took place. For example, the first CAT event may have occurred in a wealthy area consisting of owner occupied, detached homes whereas another event might effect a city centre area consisting of apartments, terraced houses in a lower income area
• By fitting calendar year, these differences in risk profile will be absorbed by the calendar year factor and will effectively dampen down the predictiveness of the other factors (and the variation of the predicted values)
• We should fit calendar year only if it is not correlated with other factors we are fitting in the model

Am I incorrect in my thought process?
 
I'm a bit confused by your question but I think if you look at the structure of the cat models as given in the notes you'll see that they answer all the points your making. The structure of the models with their different modules (event, hazard, etc.) allows the different moving parts that you've identified to be considered separately so hopefully we shouldn't end up with the kind of spuriously overfitted model you're trying to avoid.
 
Back
Top