D
DMF
Member
Hi,
In part ii) of this exam question you're asked to calculate the standard deviation on £100 invested in Stock A and Stock B (each with their own parameter values). In Part iii, we're told the investor invests £50 in each stock. Part iv) then asks for the standard deviation of the portfolio. Which relies on the standard formula: Var = Xa^2 * Var(A) + Xb^2 * Var(B) + 2* Correlation * Xa * Xb * SD(A) * SD(B).
When looking at the solution the variance figures used in the solution to (iv) are those that were calculated in part (ii) and relate to an investment of £100. The standard deviation figures using £50 are much lower than those calculated in ii). However, given iii and the commentary question in part v - I would have thought that the portfolio value would be £100 not £200. So, I am wondering why the solution uses the figures calculated from ii) and not revised figures based on £50? What am I missing?
Thanks,
In part ii) of this exam question you're asked to calculate the standard deviation on £100 invested in Stock A and Stock B (each with their own parameter values). In Part iii, we're told the investor invests £50 in each stock. Part iv) then asks for the standard deviation of the portfolio. Which relies on the standard formula: Var = Xa^2 * Var(A) + Xb^2 * Var(B) + 2* Correlation * Xa * Xb * SD(A) * SD(B).
When looking at the solution the variance figures used in the solution to (iv) are those that were calculated in part (ii) and relate to an investment of £100. The standard deviation figures using £50 are much lower than those calculated in ii). However, given iii and the commentary question in part v - I would have thought that the portfolio value would be £100 not £200. So, I am wondering why the solution uses the figures calculated from ii) and not revised figures based on £50? What am I missing?
Thanks,