• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

September 2014 Q6

A

Alibaba

Member
Regarding the part of this question where you have to calculate the operational risk capital - the exam report says "in the best estimate scenario, neither risk is expected to happen" and so the best estimate cost is zero.

I would have thought that best estimate is equivalent to expected value / mean, and not the median. I feel like this is broadly the consensus on what best estimate means and haven't really come across any situation in work or study where the median is used. Is it fair to say that an approach which gets the capital requirement relative to expected value would have gotten marks? Is there any real life context where the median of the distribution could legitimately be taken as the best estimate?
 
Hi Alibaba,

In the SP9 exam, it is often the case that 'there is no single right answer', and that well-argued answers will be given credit.

In ActEd's ASET for this exam we took a different approach, as follows:

For operational risk, expected losses are:
Risk A: £500,000 x 5% = £25,000
Risk B: £1,000,000 x 0.25% = £2,500
Total expected loss = £27,500

At the 99.5 percentile, risk A is assumed to occur at a cost of £500,000, but risk B does
not (so zero cost).

Hence, VaR(Op) = £500,000 - £27,500 = £472,500

David
 
Back
Top