September 2012 Question 4. 7, 5

Discussion in 'SP2' started by dChetty, Apr 10, 2016.

  1. dChetty

    dChetty Member

    q4. The solution says:
    "Risks: different risks are run with each approach, development risk if keeping the existing model whereas a new model introduces counterparty risk". Will counterparty risk be to the extent that the party who sells the model doesn't help with the development or workings of the model etc.?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 13, 2016
  2. dChetty

    dChetty Member

    Q5. solution says "Pre-set limits trigger assumption changes". Is pre-set limits something the company documents and compares with actual assumptions and change their parameters according to pre-set limits?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 13, 2016
  3. dChetty

    dChetty Member

    The solution says "A less detailed level of underwriting would reduce the homogenisation of the risks that the company is exposed to. This could lead to higher fluctuation of claims experience and thus need to hold higher reserves". Why is homogenisation so important?
     
  4. Darrell Chainey

    Darrell Chainey ActEd Tutor Staff Member

    4. Or just gets it wrong, or goes bust.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 13, 2016
  5. Net Premium

    Net Premium Member

    5. Yes, it's possible. but I wouldn't worry about this level of detail.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 13, 2016
  6. dChetty

    dChetty Member

    Thanks.
     
  7. Admin

    Admin Administrator Staff Member

    Makes it easier to accurately assess the risk.
     
  8. dChetty

    dChetty Member

    Thanks
    Is it because the company could use one mortality table to price all similar risks instead of many mortality tables for pricing?
     
  9. Net Premium

    Net Premium Member

    but the risks are less likely to be similar if you underwrite less
     
  10. dChetty

    dChetty Member

    I mean if you underwrite more.
     

Share This Page