Same feeling over here...wished i had looked at q2 first!
Ahhh no powerpoint, they did the same thing last Sept i think, would have been so nice.
I will fail because of Q1. I think that i got the first part about right - explain MWRR, TWRR, and why we should use TWRR, etc.
but the second bit, i messed up...
the sad thing is that a similar question came up in the past, specimen paper 05 i think, and i looked at it in the morning, but still messed up.
What should have been said is very simple, they invested lots when mtks were down, so would not fully benefit!
Also struggld with the word count strangely.
Q2, really enjoyed it. I addressed it to the person who sent me the email. because i thought that he would want to check my work before sending the memo to the cust serv mgr. anyway, i dont think that this will be a major factor here.
My word count was 486, which is within the acceptable limits.
If one of you could shed some light on this issue which i cannot get my head round:
if you did well in one question (here q2) but did not get the technical content rite for part of q1 (second half), does this mean that you fail overall???
If you do, then why do we have 2 questions?
How do they determine whether someone passed or fail?
thanks