• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

september 2006 - continuous payments

J

johnpe21

Member
Hi. I am a bit confused with the present values of continuous payments. I solved question 2 by firstly calculating the pv and then accumulated it for 3 years. For this question , for the present value I took (4+6u+8u^2).

I tried to do the same in question 10 of the same paper. But in the solutions, for the first payment, for example for the cost to companies, he takes for the first year 50U and not 50 as the pv of the first payment.

COuld you please explain why is it the case? I cant see the difference, as for both questions it says "a rate of .. in the first year"

Thanks a lot
 
Hi. I am a bit confused with the present values of continuous payments. I solved question 2 by firstly calculating the pv and then accumulated it for 3 years. For this question , for the present value I took (4+6u+8u^2).

What is u? Is that v (the discount factor)? And you're missing the continuous level annuity.

Would be correct if the expression was multiplied by a one year level continuous annuity.

I tried to do the same in question 10 of the same paper. But in the solutions, for the first payment, for example for the cost to companies, he takes for the first year 50U and not 50 as the pv of the first payment.

Yeah - that's why we produce the ASET. The examiners have written this in an unusual way.

A one-year level continuous annuity is (1-v)/δ. But 1-v = iv. Hence they have written it as i/δ × v.

So it is the same - it's just the way that it has been written.
 
Back
Top