• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Sept 2013 Q34

E

e_sit

Member
Hi guys :)

For part (ii) of this question the exam solution states that "Country A will devote half of its available resources to producing socks and half to producing shoes. Therefore Country A will produce 10 socks and 10 shoes."

But since when does it say that the total resource for country A is 20 hours (assuming resources are in units of hours)?

Furthermore, isn't A already producing equal amounts of socks and shoes already from the beginning?

And for B, " Country B will devote 1/3 of its available resources to producing socks and 2/3 of their resources producing shoes. Therefore Country B will produce 6 socks and 6 shoes."

Why does B have to deote 1/3 of its available resources to socks? And why is there total of 18 hours resources?

Is there some underlying assumptions that I'm missing?

Thanks a bunch!!
 
Hiii e-sit,

Here in the first line of question they have mentioned that "the table below shows weekly production of either socks OR shoes in both country", so country A have resources to produce either 20 socks or 20shoes ,it cannot produce both. If it have to produce both it will have to compromise a bit of other . And since question asks for equal production of both it can produce both 10 units.
Hope this helps
 
The question says that in each week, A can produce either 20 shoes (if it devotes all its resources to producing shoes) or 20 socks (if it devotes all its resources to producing socks). Likewise B can produce 18 socks or 9 shoes if it devotes all its resources to producing either one good or the other. The question doesn't actually specify what each country will do.

So, for example, if B devoted half of its weekly resources to producing each good, it would produce 9 socks and 4.5 shoes.

In (i), A has the absolute advantage in both goods, as it can produce more of each from its available weekly resources.

A has the comparative advantage (CA) in shoes (as the opportunity cost (OC) of each extra shoe is just one sock), wheras for B it is 2 socks. Conversely, B has the CA in socks, as the OC of each sock is just 1/2 a shoe.

In part (ii), as it is equally efficient at producing both goods, to produce equal amounts of socks and shoes, A will need to devote 1/2 its resources to each good and so will produce 10 of each good. This answers (ii)(a).

B could produce 18 socks and 0 shoes, or 16 socks and 1 shoes, or 14 socks and 2 shoes, or 12 socks and 3 shoes or 10 socks and 4 shoes, or 8 socks and 5 shoes or 6 socks and 6 shoes and so on. So, 6 socks and 6 shoes is the answer to (ii)(b).

Total production in the two countries would then be 16 socks and 16 shoes, whereas if they specialise based on CA, A produces 20 shoes and B produces 18 socks, giving a net gain of 4 shoes and 2 socks!
 
Back
Top