• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Sept 2013 Paper1 Q4 part i - still relevant?

D

dazed and confused

Member
I'm working through various past papers and am struggling to identify which questions are still relevant.
In particular question 4i) from Sept 2013 paper 1 - "List 4 ways in which scenarios could be derived for use in a capital model".
From the way it's worded it feels like a bookwork question, but I cannot find the relevant bit of core reading where this would be set out in the 2016 version of the notes.
Although I could probably have had a good guess at the answer, this does not seem to be in the notes any more, otherwise it's not a bookwork question. Or am I missing something?

Thanks
 
I don't think you're missing anything, I just don't think it appears in the Core Reading as an explicit list of four things. Definitely agree with you that the solution feels like bookwork, but it's actually more about application. The question does ask for ways in which scenarios could be derived rather than the four ways in which scenarios are derived - which would be more likely to require a bookwork list.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top