• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Sep 2018 q1 viii

D

dimitris13

Member
hi
the question asks what are the op risks wrt moving from pim to im which is basically changing the op risk from sf to an int model.
it says in the solution
"for the annuity business this will include inadequate analysis of in force business"
what does this mean and where it refers to?
 
hi
the question asks what are the op risks wrt moving from pim to im which is basically changing the op risk from sf to an int model.
it says in the solution
"for the annuity business this will include inadequate analysis of in force business"
what does this mean and where it refers to?
Hi
This is referred to within the Operational risk section of the Core Reading (see Chapter 22 Section 5).
This could refer to not including sufficient data in analysis or not using the appropriate experience, etc.
Thanks
Em
 
I don’t fully understand this question. How come the consideration of operation risks will change when the company changes a partial internal model to a full one? Is this in the course notes?
 
The question states that the company's partial internal model is such that it uses an internal model for all risks other than operational risk, for which it uses the standard formula.

The question is therefore asking about how your assessment of operational risk would change once you were doing it under the internal model (which, as stated in the Core Reading (CR), needs to allow for the company's own view of its operational risks) rather than under the standard formula (SF).

The SF operational risk module is described in the CR as being 'relatively simple, being based on percentages of earned premiums and technical provisions'. So it doesn't take into consideration the specific op risks that the company would consider itself to be exposed to.

So yes, it's basically there!
 
Back
Top