M
Matthew_Law
Member
Hi guys,
This questions relates to project risk and mitigation methods:
"A large financial institution has been asked by a consortium to provide significant debt finance for a major project. The consortium proposes to construct and then manage a number of new hotels in a range of developing countries. The target customers for the hotels would be affluent tourists from developed countries."
"Describe significant risks to the consortium’s revenues once construction has been completed. For each risk, explain the actions that could be taken to reduce the chance of the risk occurring."
For 12 marks I know I should generate as much points as I can. But how come in the solutions the examiner listed out points such as
"Terrorism or the fear of terrorism could lead to less overseas travel. Governments and others could improve security arrangements or the consortium could build hotels in countries less prone to unrest."
What is the logic behind using the latter point?
This questions relates to project risk and mitigation methods:
"A large financial institution has been asked by a consortium to provide significant debt finance for a major project. The consortium proposes to construct and then manage a number of new hotels in a range of developing countries. The target customers for the hotels would be affluent tourists from developed countries."
"Describe significant risks to the consortium’s revenues once construction has been completed. For each risk, explain the actions that could be taken to reduce the chance of the risk occurring."
For 12 marks I know I should generate as much points as I can. But how come in the solutions the examiner listed out points such as
"Terrorism or the fear of terrorism could lead to less overseas travel. Governments and others could improve security arrangements or the consortium could build hotels in countries less prone to unrest."
What is the logic behind using the latter point?