• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Sep 08 Paper 1 Q6 (iv)

M

Matthew_Law

Member
Hi guys,

This questions relates to project risk and mitigation methods:

"A large financial institution has been asked by a consortium to provide significant debt finance for a major project. The consortium proposes to construct and then manage a number of new hotels in a range of developing countries. The target customers for the hotels would be affluent tourists from developed countries."

"Describe significant risks to the consortium’s revenues once construction has been completed. For each risk, explain the actions that could be taken to reduce the chance of the risk occurring."

For 12 marks I know I should generate as much points as I can. But how come in the solutions the examiner listed out points such as

"Terrorism or the fear of terrorism could lead to less overseas travel. Governments and others could improve security arrangements or the consortium could build hotels in countries less prone to unrest."

What is the logic behind using the latter point?
 
Hi guys,

This questions relates to project risk and mitigation methods:

"A large financial institution has been asked by a consortium to provide significant debt finance for a major project. The consortium proposes to construct and then manage a number of new hotels in a range of developing countries. The target customers for the hotels would be affluent tourists from developed countries."

"Describe significant risks to the consortium’s revenues once construction has been completed. For each risk, explain the actions that could be taken to reduce the chance of the risk occurring."

For 12 marks I know I should generate as much points as I can. But how come in the solutions the examiner listed out points such as

"Terrorism or the fear of terrorism could lead to less overseas travel. Governments and others could improve security arrangements or the consortium could build hotels in countries less prone to unrest."

What is the logic behind using the latter point?
Hi Matthew

Yes, it is tricky to see what is meant by "once construction has been completed". What the examiners are saying here is that they are not covering risks of the construction process itself, eg cost of bricks, delays due to bad weather.

However, the risk of terrorism is something that would occur after the hotel is built. But the question says that the hotels are only at the proposal stage at present. So it is not too late to mitigate this risk by choosing different locations.

Good luck with the exams this week.

Mark
 
Back
Top