• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

SA5 September 2015 Q3

J

James789

Member
I have been looking at September 2015 Q3. Part (i) on CDS seems fine, however there seem to be some pretty big issues with the rest of the question in both the exam paper and the examiners' report.

Namely, the formula seems to assume one can substitute the continuously compounded risk free rate with the real world drift in the Merton model analysis. If mu as written in the question is the risk-free rate the formula correctly gives the risk neutral default probability. However, one can't motivate simply replacing this with the real world drift to obtain a real world default probability, which is what the question (and solution) seems to implicitly assume.

Also:
Even if one could do this, the solution says mu is the 'expected annual return on the firm's assets', when in fact is is related to the log-return.
The solution says that sigma is between 0 and 1, but there is no reason for an upper limit on sigma.

The examiners' report refers to the core reading - did the core reading back in 2015 contain formulae and discussion for such a 'real world' option price analysis, or is this just a really bad question? Would you get marks for giving what appears to be the actual correct explanation?
 
I must admit, I dont cover CT8 and am probably not the best person to answer this one. Maybe another student with detailed CT8 / Black Scholes knowledge can shed light on this. It was a strange question - the core reading it refers to must, I assume, be CT8 because the core reading for SA5 has never included anything on this topic and has not changed since 2015.

I also suspect, like most SA5 questions, the examiners report contains only a subset of the comments that could have scored marks. If you knew the meanings of the underlying terms in the formula, you would have scored marks whether you got the exact details right (lognormal returns rather than returns) or not.

I hope this helps, and maybe someone else can shed light.
 
Back
Top