I found the paper to be quite well-balanced. All in all, there were questions on:
Pricing
Valuation (Solvency I Pillar 1 liabilities)
Capital management (including Pillar 2 and economic capital) + Modelling
Monitoring experience (AoS)
I think Question 1 Part 1 and 2 on calculation of AoS and the components (all for 24 marks) may have stunned quite a few people. However, there was a past paper question on AoEV which had a similar structure.
I went with it as follows:
Q1 Part 1 - Calculation of surplus arising over the year
This is simply (A1-L1) - (A0 - L0) and all we had to do was to calculate these four figures. No analysis of components (withdrawals, expenses, investment, mortality, new business) were required.
Q2 Part2 - Calculation of individual components of surplus
This was calculating each of withdrawal, expense, investment, mortality and new business surplus over the year as well as calculating the last step of "unexplained".
All in all for question 1, I think I made a reasonable attempt although I probably didn't get 100% of all the calculations correct. However, I can already picture in my mind in the examiner's report or ASET they may say something like "Students who had the overall calculation structure correct for the surplus arising and individual components of surplus tended to have gained the most marks".
I must admit this 24 mark calculation question along with the tax calculation questions (10 marks, question 2 part ii) totaling around 35 marks did indeed take up quite amount of time and I did feel pressured in terms of time remaining compared to when I was practising past paper questions.
For question 1 part ii) where we had to discuss capital in excess of Solvency I Pillar 1, I interpreted the question to be focusing more on the side of discussing Pillar 2 and economic capital requirements along with rating agency capital requirements. I know there are other general uses of capital such as reducing reinsurance, expanding into other product lines or M&A type activities but unfortunately I did not have enough time to get around to discussing these briefly towards the end of the exam due to time pressure.
With regard to the discussion of pricing model in question 2 part i), that question was for 10 marks and we just had to discuss what the impact of retail distribution review would have been on the pricing model and profitability. I think if we showed understanding of how pricing models work then we would have gained a significant number of marks.
Please let me know what you guys thought of the paper. However, I must say that I found the paper quite tough compared to many of the past papers (probably except for the past paper which included questions on AoEV and another that included questions surrounding FSA return forms).
Last edited by a moderator: May 2, 2013