relationship between qx and mu_x

Discussion in 'CS2' started by iamminime, Sep 9, 2023.

  1. iamminime

    iamminime Keen member

    We know that d(tqx)/dt = tPx * mu_(x+t)
    However, according to ch.6, Page 6, mu_(x+t) = (lim h->0+) P[T<=x+t+h | T > x+t] / h
    I put t = 0, mu_x = (lim h->0+) P[ T<=x+h | T > x] / h
    since P[T<=x+h | T > x] is hqx, so mu_x = (lim h->0+) hqx/h
    Since 0qx = 0, then mu_x = (lim h->0+) (hqx - 0qx)/h
    Now the RHS is same as d tqx/dt, so d tqx/dt = mu_x ?

    I am very confused. Please help on the above. Thanks a lot!!
     
  2. Andrew Martin

    Andrew Martin ActEd Tutor Staff Member

    Hello

    You've shown that d(tqx) / dt evaluated at t = 0 is equal to mu_x, which is correct as it is 0px * mu_x and 0px is 1. In your final line, the RHS is the derivative of tqx evaluated at 0.

    Hope this helps!

    Andy
     
  3. iamminime

    iamminime Keen member

    Thank you very much!!!
     

Share This Page