• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Question on page 5 of Chapter 2 on course notes

Millie

Made first post
Hi, I dont quite understand how the following solution was derived. The question is trying to provide an example how the expected utility is a weighted average of the individual outcomes.
Question: State an expression for the expectation of the next period utility of investor X, assuming he invests a proportion 'a' in Equity (which pays -4% or +8% with respective probabilities 1/4 and 3/4) and the rest in a non-interest-bearing bank account. He has the utility function U(w) = log(w)
Solution: E[U(w)] = 0.25{log((1-0.04a)w)} +0.75{log((1+0.08a)w)}
My confusion lies with why is it not 0.25{log (0.96aw)} + 0.75 {log(1.08aw)}? Why is this not the right way to think about it. Would be grateful for an explanation to the solution.
Thank you!
 
Unfortunately your formulation won't work. Looks what happens to your formula when a=0.
With proportion a held in Equity A and proportion (1-a) in the bank (with zero return), the wealth of the investor is either:
aw(1.08) + w(1-a) or
aw(0.96) + w(1-a).
The first terms come from Equity A yielding either 8% or -4% and the second terms come from the proportion held in the bank.
Simplifying these expressions gives either:
w(1+0.08a) or
w(1-0.04a) as required.
Hope that helps.
 
Back
Top