A
amused942
Member
I don't understand the solution to this.
I understand the first step which is to discount back the £267 to mid-2009 terms, using the 1/2% per month inflation rate, to get £254.
When calculating the monetary amount of the average claims payment in the new rating era, the calc is given as 254 x (1.02^2.5) x (1.10^2.5) x 1.10^(10/12) = £367
Why should the last term be necessary ("building in the claims inflation for the 10 months between occurrence and settlement") when we have already allowed for inflation between mid-2009 and end-2011 (penultimate term) ?
[I'm using the 2011 verison of notes, in case the calendar years in example have changed since]
I understand the first step which is to discount back the £267 to mid-2009 terms, using the 1/2% per month inflation rate, to get £254.
When calculating the monetary amount of the average claims payment in the new rating era, the calc is given as 254 x (1.02^2.5) x (1.10^2.5) x 1.10^(10/12) = £367
Why should the last term be necessary ("building in the claims inflation for the 10 months between occurrence and settlement") when we have already allowed for inflation between mid-2009 and end-2011 (penultimate term) ?
[I'm using the 2011 verison of notes, in case the calendar years in example have changed since]