• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Question 12.8

A

amused942

Member
I don't understand the solution to this.

I understand the first step which is to discount back the £267 to mid-2009 terms, using the 1/2% per month inflation rate, to get £254.

When calculating the monetary amount of the average claims payment in the new rating era, the calc is given as 254 x (1.02^2.5) x (1.10^2.5) x 1.10^(10/12) = £367

Why should the last term be necessary ("building in the claims inflation for the 10 months between occurrence and settlement") when we have already allowed for inflation between mid-2009 and end-2011 (penultimate term) ?

[I'm using the 2011 verison of notes, in case the calendar years in example have changed since]
 
Adjustment for inflation between mid-2009 and end-2011 is for the claims incurred cost itself (assuming no delays such as reporting and settlement).

To have the same "power" of compensation (i.e. claims payment), it is necessary to adjust for the inflation and/or trend from occurrence to settlement.

For instance, if the final (trended and inflated) compensation is a cup of Starbucks coffee, the payments made last year and this year are very likely to be different, due to inflation.
 
Back
Top