• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Q4.5 q and a

S

SABeauty

Member
i

The question asks for the effect on EV of increasing interest rate on WOP statutory basis.

It also says the RDR is greater than any investment return assumption used.

It is stated that:

1. it reduces the WP benefit reserve and hence accelerates the release of profit.

Why does it accelerate the release of profit?

2. Because the RDR is higher than the return on assets, the free assets increase by more than the reduction in PV future transfers?

What does this mean?

I am really struggling to understand this. Please can someone use a simple example to explain this?
 
The question asks for the effect on EV of increasing interest rate on WOP statutory basis.

It also says the RDR is greater than any investment return assumption used.

It is stated that:

1. it reduces the Without-profits reserve and hence accelerates the release of profit.

Why does it accelerate the release of profit?

2. Because the RDR is higher than the return on assets, the free assets increase by more than the reduction in PV future transfers?

What does this mean?

I am really struggling to understand this. Please can someone use a simple example to explain this?

Yes, a simple example would be better to explain this.

Consider a simple one year contract with reserves of 100 (calculated as a prudent estimate of the claims of 102, discounted back at the valuation interest rate of 2%).

The expected claim at the end of the year on the EV projection basis is 80. The assets backing the reserve are expected to grow to 105 if the EV projection assumption is 5% interest. The profit at the end of the year is then 105 - 80 = 25. The VIF (value of in force business) is then 25 / 1.08 = 23.14815, assuming that the RDR is 8% (ie higher than the return on assets). If the insurer has assets of 120 then the EV is 120-100 + 23.14815=43.14815.

Now let's recalculate if the valuation interest rate goes up to 4%. The reserve is now 102/1.04=98.07692. The expected claim at the end of the year on the EV projection basis is still 80. The assets backing the reserve are expected to grow to 98.07692x1.05=102.98077 if the EV projection assumption is 5% interest as before. The profit at the end of the year is then 102.98077 - 80 = 22.98077. The VIF is then 22.98077 / 1.08 = 21.27849, assuming that the RDR is still 8%. The insurer has assets of 120 so the EV is 120-98.07692 + 21.27849=43.20157 (not much bigger than before, but the difference is significant if the fund is worth billions rather than 100 - the impact is also bigger for a longer term product).

In response to your two questions:

1. The reserves have reduced from 100 to 98.07692, so profit of (almost) 2 is released at time zero due to the change in basis. This is what we mean by accelerating the release of profit. The reserves are a lot bigger than the claim (due to prudence), so money is tied up in the reserves and is released as profit at a later date. By reducing the reserves we have released this profit a little faster.

2. The free asset were 20 and have increased (after the basis change) to 120-98.07692=21.92308. The VIF has fallen from 23.14815 to 21.27849. The EV increases because the free assets have increased more than the VIF has reduced. The reason why is that in the VIF equations above, we rolled up the assets backing the reserves at 5% and then discounted them back when they were released at 8%.

I hope this example helps.

Best wishes

Mark
 
One last question - how is the cost of capital included in this? Or has it not been included?
 
One last question - how is the cost of capital included in this? Or has it not been included?

We could allow for the cost of capital in the same way as the example below.

We'd take the required capital, roll it up with the EV projection rate of 5% until the point at which it can be released, and then discount back at 8%. The difference between this discounted figure and the required capital is the cost of capital.

Best wishes

Mark
 
Back
Top