• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Q23 of Notes

S

Snowy

Member
Hypothesis testing:
Why is the result of 94% or over very UNlikely at 90% confidence interval?
 
In Q23, you are testing the null hypothesis that 90% of customers are happy with your service (ie p=0.9) against the alternative hypothesis that more than 90% are happy with your service (ie p>0.9).

In your sample of 100 customers, 94 were happy with your service, ie the sample proportion is 0.94. We want to know if this is significant at the 10% level.

This result will be significant at the 10% level if the probability of getting a sample result as high as this when the true proportion is actually 0.9, is less than 10%. In this case the probability is less than 10%, so the result is significant. It suggests that more than 90% are happy with your service.
 
Back
Top