M
misterh
Member
Ok this is my first time using Q&A bank and am surprised at the level of detail in the solutions. They seem to go into way more detail than the past exam paper solutions - a lot of the time into what seems like too much detail to the point that they are expaining really basic things, coming up with some crazy alternatives and even qualifying them as such in the answer. It almost seems like they are religiously sticking to their 1/2 mark per point rule so for example have to come up with up to 44 points for a 22 mark question which probably might have only 15 to 20 "sensible" points in the answer. Is this 1 mark per important point and 1/2 per other point how the actual papers are marked? Are we really expected to go into up to a hundred points per question? Am sorry its just not the impression I have been given til now from just looking through past exam papers on the subjects I've done til now. Is this just something on the Q&A Bank solutions to try to go into way more detail as a learning tool. Am just having a panic attack going through these - I've done the past papers and was happy with the solutions - the solutions seem to deal with "specifics" whereas some of the Q&A Bank solutions are soo basic and hypothetical!!! I understand a certain level of thinking outside the box is required but there does genuinely seem to be a different level of detail and volume in the solutions from the 2 sources? Which one is more accurate? Is this just my interpretation? Thanks for any feedback....