• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Put-call are convex under no arbitrage

S

Son Isfa

Member
Show that under no arbitrage assumption, the PUT option price is a convex function of the underlying asset price. Is this true for the CALL option? What can you say about the delta of these options?
 
I am doing this for European call option you can easily replicate the same for the European put option.
The Black-Scholes-Merton result is

\begin{equation} c = S_0N(d_1) - Ke^{-rT}N(d_2) \tag{1} \end{equation}

Where:
\(c\) : Price of European Call option
\(S_0\): Price of underlying asset today
\(K\): Strike Price or Exercise Price
\(r\): expected return, risk free return
\(T\): time to maturity of the option
\(\sigma \): stock volatility
\(N(.)\): CDF of standard normal distribution

\(d_1 = \dfrac{\ln(S_0e^{rT}/K) +\sigma ^2T/2 }{\sigma \sqrt{T}}\), \(d_2 = \dfrac{\ln(S_0e^{rT}/K) -\sigma ^2T/2 }{\sigma \sqrt{T}}\)

Note that following holds

\(d_1 = d_2 + \sigma \sqrt{T}\)

\(N'(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\exp(-\frac{x^2}{2}) \quad \forall x\in \mathcal{R}\)

By the above two observations lets first establish some relationship between \(N'(d_1)\) and \(N'(d_2)\).

\begin{align} N'(d_1) &= N'(d_2+\sigma \sqrt{T}) \\ &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\exp\left (-\frac{(d_2+\sigma \sqrt{T})^2}{2}\right ) \\ &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\exp\left (-\frac{d_2^2}{2}-\frac{\sigma^2 T}{2}-d_2\sigma \sqrt{T}\right )\\ &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\exp\left (-\frac{d_2^2}{2}\right )\exp\left (-\left (\frac{\sigma^2 T}{2}+d_2\sigma \sqrt{T}\right )\right)\\ &= N'(d_2)\exp\left (-\left (\frac{\sigma^2 T}{2}+d_2\sigma \sqrt{T}\right )\right) \tag{2} \end{align}

Now by using the expression of \(d_2\) above we the following

\begin{align} -\left (\frac{\sigma^2 T}{2}+d_2\sigma \sqrt{T}\right ) &= -\ln\left(\frac{S_0e^{rT}}{K}\right) \\ \Leftrightarrow \exp\left (-\left (\frac{\sigma^2 T}{2}+d_2\sigma \sqrt{T}\right )\right) &= \frac{K}{S_0e^{rT}} \end{align}

By substituting the above expression in (2) we get

\begin{align} S_0N'(d_1) = Ke^{-rT}N'(d_2) \tag{3}\end{align}

Now let's show that \(c\) is convex in \(S_0\) i.e. the price of underlying asset

\begin{align*} \frac{\partial c}{\partial S_0} &= S_0N'(d_1)\frac{\partial d_1}{\partial S_0} + N(d_1) - ke^{-rT}N'(d_2)\frac{\partial d_2}{\partial S_0}\\ &= S_0N'(d_1)\frac{\partial d_1}{\partial S_0} + N(d_1) - ke^{-rT}N'(d_2)\frac{\partial d_1}{\partial S_0}\\ &= N(d_1) + \frac{\partial d_1}{\partial S_0}(S_0N'(d_1)-Ke^{-rT}N'(d_2)) \\ &= N(d_1) \end{align*}

The above expression is the delta of european call.

\begin{align*} \frac{\partial ^2 c}{\partial S_0^2} &= N'(d_1)\frac{\partial d_1}{\partial S_0}\\ &= \frac{N'(d_1)}{S_0\sigma \sqrt{T}} \end{align*}

Since the second partial derivative of \(c\) wrt \(S_0\) is always positive therefore \(c\) is convex in \(S_0\)
 
Back
Top