• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Performance Attribution

M

MrMikeR

Member
I think my understanding/misunderstanding of this topic can be cleared up with the following question. I get the general idea and could probably produce the maths in the exam. However.....

What I dont get is this. If the stock selector just follows the notional portfolio, the returns due to sector selection will all be zero and all the return will be attributed to the stock selectors. However surely the the sector selectors would deserve some credit as it is their strategy that was followed exactly?

I think I am missing something in my overall understanding. The maths of it seems fine to me.
 
Hi Mike. You are right that the sector selectors may be due some credit but if we are invested exactly as per our notional portfolio, we don't know what credit is due.

We can only see a sector selection profit if we measure against some benchmark which differs from how we actually invested our assets.

So if our sector selector is 60%/40% Equity/Gilts and we actually invest in these proportions - there will be no sector profits. However, if our sector selectors had deliberately chosen 60%/40% rather than 50%/50% then we could analyse against the 50%/50% benchmark and this would reveal the profit (or loss!) from the 60%/40% strategy.

Simon
 
Back
Top