• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Payout vs Investment Return for WP

A

Adam

Member
A question on page 7 of SA2-03 asks "Explain why payouts on 25-year conventional with-profits endowments might fall despite having investment returns of 10% over the year". I have difficulty in understanding what it is trying to ask and the answer provided. Could anyone help with this, please? Thank you.

Answer is "The returns 26 years ago might have been greater than 10% and these would no longer be relevant for the latest 25-year maturities". Where is the 26 from? Does it mean that the policy will mature in 25 years from today and 10% is only the investment return in year 1 of the policy?
 
Xu Shi said:
A question on page 7 of SA2-03 asks "Explain why payouts on 25-year conventional with-profits endowments might fall despite having investment returns of 10% over the year". I have difficulty in understanding what it is trying to ask and the answer provided. Could anyone help with this, please? Thank you.

Answer is "The returns 26 years ago might have been greater than 10% and these would no longer be relevant for the latest 25-year maturities". Where is the 26 from? Does it mean that the policy will mature in 25 years from today and 10% is only the investment return in year 1 of the policy?
Click to expand...

Consider the following:
a) A 25 year policy that matured in 2018. The contract would therefore have been written in 1993.

b) A 25 year policy that matured in 2019. The contract would have been written in 1994.

The solution is highlighting that different generations of policyholder may have experienced different investment conditions and therefore payout levels (eg broadly 100% of asset share).

The policy from a) would have earned the return in 1993 but not the return in 2019 as the policy had already matured.

Similarly, the policy from b) would have earned the return in 2019 but not the return in 1993 (ie 26 years ago).

The payout of the 25 year policy that matured in 2018 would be higher than the 25 year policy that matured the following year if the return in 1993 exceeded the return in 2019.

For completeness (but outside the scope of the question):
I wouldn’t be surprised if the payout was materially higher in this case given the effect of compound interest. The effect of compounding would probably mean that the 1993 return could actually be less than the 2019 return. And support higher 2018 payouts relative to the 2019 payouts the following year (all else equal).
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top