F
fireranger
Member
hi guys
I am new here. our university just started the course so its not certified yet so I am not sure where these questions should go. but I could really use your help as our teacher isnt very good so i have no idea whats going on.
Thanks
1. An investor has wealth X and invests a proportion (alpha) in a risky asset
that will increase in value by y% (so that an investment of 1 would
increase to 1+y) with probability p and fall to zero with probability
1 − p. The amount not invested in the risky asset will neither increase
nor decrease in value.
(a) If the investor has a utility function U(w) = ln(w) then show that
expected utility is maximimized by maximizing
lnX + p ln(1 + alpha*y) + (1 − p) ln(1 − alpha)
(b) Hence show that expected utility is maximized when
alpha = {yp- (1-p)}/{y}
What does the numerator represent?
(c) Find the proportion of the investor’s wealth that he would be prepared
to invest in an asset that doubled in value with probability 5/6 but became worthless with probability 1/6.
Q2. Show that the utility function U(w) = pw has
(a) decreasing absolute risk aversion.
(b) constant relative risk aversion.
Q3. An individual and an insurer both have a utility function U(w) = ln(w).
The individual has initial wealth 10 and the insurer has initial wealth
100.
(a) Calculate the premium P that the individual would be prepared
to pay to fully insure a loss of 5 with probability 50%.
(b) Show that the premium Q that the insurer requires satisfies the
equation
Q^2 + 195Q − 500 = 0
(c) Hence find the premium that the insurer requires.
(d) Comment on the difference between P and Q.
Thanks
Greatly appreciate it
I am new here. our university just started the course so its not certified yet so I am not sure where these questions should go. but I could really use your help as our teacher isnt very good so i have no idea whats going on.
Thanks
1. An investor has wealth X and invests a proportion (alpha) in a risky asset
that will increase in value by y% (so that an investment of 1 would
increase to 1+y) with probability p and fall to zero with probability
1 − p. The amount not invested in the risky asset will neither increase
nor decrease in value.
(a) If the investor has a utility function U(w) = ln(w) then show that
expected utility is maximimized by maximizing
lnX + p ln(1 + alpha*y) + (1 − p) ln(1 − alpha)
(b) Hence show that expected utility is maximized when
alpha = {yp- (1-p)}/{y}
What does the numerator represent?
(c) Find the proportion of the investor’s wealth that he would be prepared
to invest in an asset that doubled in value with probability 5/6 but became worthless with probability 1/6.
Q2. Show that the utility function U(w) = pw has
(a) decreasing absolute risk aversion.
(b) constant relative risk aversion.
Q3. An individual and an insurer both have a utility function U(w) = ln(w).
The individual has initial wealth 10 and the insurer has initial wealth
100.
(a) Calculate the premium P that the individual would be prepared
to pay to fully insure a loss of 5 with probability 50%.
(b) Show that the premium Q that the insurer requires satisfies the
equation
Q^2 + 195Q − 500 = 0
(c) Hence find the premium that the insurer requires.
(d) Comment on the difference between P and Q.
Thanks
Greatly appreciate it