• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

mortality projection

H

Harleen Anand

Member
There is a line in the study material which is as follows:
it is possible to work with the age and cohort but the cohort approach makes heavy data demands and there is a largely insolvable problem that the recent cohort have their history truncated by the present day.
firstly what is this unsoluble problem and what does it means by their " recent history truncated by the present day "

Thanks
 
Hello

When analysing mortality by age, we should have lots of data available (lives aged x at some point in time) to help estimate age effects. When analysing by period, we should also have lots of data available (lives alive at particular points in time).

However, when analysing by cohort, we're considering more specific groups of lives, say those born in a particular year. For example, say we're interested in the cohort born in 2015 and the specific mortality related to these lives. Well, we only have 5 years of past data for these lives so it is difficult to understand their specific cohort effect (how this cohort may differ to others) with such a small amount of data.

There's also nothing we can really do about it, we just have to wait for the lives to get older so that we have more data on their particular cohort.

Hope this helps.

Andy
 
Back
Top