• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Monte carlo methods

W

welsh_owen

Member
Hi All,

In chapter 10 of the notes different Numerical methods are considered for valuing derivatives.

For the section which looks at Monte Carlo simulation I wondered why it is necessary to build a quadratic function to estimate Vi (the present value of the derivative assuming this is not exercised)?

I think I might have missed something but to my mind would it not be easier to evaluate the actual difference between Vi and the intrinsic value of the derivative assuming it were exercised at this point?

Cheers
Owen
 
Hi Owen

The problem is that you don't know the actual value of Vi at each point in the future. All you know is that for this particular run the final payoff was some amount, but this includes a large random component depending on how the asset price moved after this point in this particular run.

So the idea of the LS method is that you can try to average out some of this random component by fitting a least-squares formula to all the discounted payoffs at that time point and then assume that this will be close enough to the true value.

If you look at the solution to Sep09 Q5 in ASET, you can see how the method works.

David
 
Thanks David,

That's great. I (think I) understand how to calculate this method. Just wanted to clarify why it was needed. The need to reduce the randomness associated with each run makes sense.

Thank-you for clarifying
O.
 
Back
Top