• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Marginal pdf

M

maz1987

Member
Pg 9 of Chapter 6 the notes gives an example of a joint pdf:

f(x,y) = 0.5 if x>0, y>0, x+y<2
.........= 0 otherwise

It uses 2-x as the upper bound of the integral used in order to obtain the marginal pdf of X. I understand this.

However I modified it slightly to give an example of a lower bound involving the variable:

f(x,y) = 0.5 if x> -2, y>0, x+y>2
.........= 0 otherwise.

Would I integrate between 2-x and infinity to obtain the marginal distribution of X in this case?

And, more generally, if we have one constraint that involves both variables, do we put the variable that we're removing as the subject, and then use that as the intuitive boundary (e.g. if f(x,y)< something it's the upper boundary, assuming y has a positive sign, and if f(x,y)> something it's the lower boundary).

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • marginal.jpg
    marginal.jpg
    16.9 KB · Views: 157
The general principal of to get f(x) integrate over y and use limits for y in terms of x is sound.

Your example doesn't work as the area is infinite - so the double integral won't sum to 1 and more importantly your lower limit isn't quite the lower limit for all the values of y as y > 0 comes into play when x > 2.
 
Back
Top