• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Ito's Lemma - Geometric Brownian Motion

R

RedCoat

Member
Hi, please could somebody help with applying Ito's Lemma to Geometric Brownian Motion? Apologies for it being horrendous to read, I couldn't seem to get the maths notation to display in my post. I will use pd to show partial derivatives.

Suppose we have dSt = St (mu dt + sigma dZt) where Zt is a Wiener process.

Then to apply Ito's Lemma we let dQt = dSt / St = mu dt + sigma dZt, so this is now in a form to apply Ito's Lemma.

Ito's Lemma says that if dXt = mu dt + sigma dWt then df(Xt) = (mu pdf/pdXt + 0.5 * sigma^2 pd^2f/pdXt^2) dt + sigma pdf/pdXt dWt

Substituting,

df(Qt) = (mu * pdf/pdQt + 0.5 * sigma^2 * pd^2f/pdQt^2) dt + sigma pdf/pdQt dZt

Let f(Qt) = log(Qt)

Then pdf/pdQt = 1/Qt and pd^2f/pdQt^2 = -1/Qt^2
Substituting again

= df(Qt) = (mu/Qt - 0.5sigma^2 / Qt^2) dt + sigma/Qt dZt

Now, looking at (for example) the solution to Q3 on the April 2017 exam, I think my Qts should = 1 here, but I'm not sure why! Any help would be hugely appreciated. Think I'm making a huge mess of this.
 
I think you have indeed overcomplicated this.

Noting the form we need for applying Ito's lemma in the Tables: a(X,t)dt + b(X,t)dz

Our SDE has a dt term and a dz term: mu*St*dt + sigma*St*dZt so all we need to do is set a = mu*St and b=sigma*St and then, with our log function as G, Ito's lemma will take care of the rest.

Hopefully a little simpler than you were making it out to be! :)

Joe
 
Back
Top