P
PittaPan
Member
Hi,
I've just read the latest 2010 exam change: see last page on http://www.actuaries.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/129226/EdNoticeboard_200804.pdf While it's far off still, by the time I get to doing the ST papers it will probably be relevent to me.
What worries me is that I plan to study ST3 in 2009. If I pass it in time to take SA3 in 2010, it seems that I have to go back and do extra studying to cover everything in ST7 and ST8 first? But since once you have passed ST3 you cannot sit ST7 or ST8 as your 2nd ST paper, I'd still have to study another ST paper anyway. So isn't that tantamount to having to do an extra ST paper's worth of study overall?
Or what if I sat ST5 (say) in 2009 and passed it but failed ST3. Then along comes 2010, and I have to sit both ST7 and ST8 before taking SA3?!
Also, how can they say that from April 2010, SA3 will be based on having taken ST7 & ST8 beforehand, when April 2010 is the 1st session you can sit for ST & ST8?
I've just read the latest 2010 exam change: see last page on http://www.actuaries.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/129226/EdNoticeboard_200804.pdf While it's far off still, by the time I get to doing the ST papers it will probably be relevent to me.
What worries me is that I plan to study ST3 in 2009. If I pass it in time to take SA3 in 2010, it seems that I have to go back and do extra studying to cover everything in ST7 and ST8 first? But since once you have passed ST3 you cannot sit ST7 or ST8 as your 2nd ST paper, I'd still have to study another ST paper anyway. So isn't that tantamount to having to do an extra ST paper's worth of study overall?
Or what if I sat ST5 (say) in 2009 and passed it but failed ST3. Then along comes 2010, and I have to sit both ST7 and ST8 before taking SA3?!
Also, how can they say that from April 2010, SA3 will be based on having taken ST7 & ST8 beforehand, when April 2010 is the 1st session you can sit for ST & ST8?