• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

IAI May 2010 Q32

D

dextar

Member
An economy is characterized by following equations:
C = 100 + cYd =100 + 0.75Yd,
I = 45,
G = 80,
T = 20 + 0.20Y,
R = 40,
X = 40,
M = 30 + 0.10Y,
where C is consumption function, c is marginal propensity to consume, Yd is
Disposable income (Y – T + R), I is autonomous investment, G is autonomous
government purchases, T is tax function, Y is level of income, R is autonomous
transfer payments by the government, X is autonomous exports, M is import function.
Find equilibrium income.

I approached it as
Y=Cd+W=Cd+S+T+M
but solution is saying
Y= C+ c(Y – T –tY + R) + I + G +X – M – mY

Can anyone pls explain this expression.
 
This is a really difficult question and one that should no longer be asked. The aggregate demand function used in the textbook is much simpler as consumption is now a function of national income rather than disposable income.

There are two ways of finding the equilibrium income:

(1) aggregate demand = aggregate supply
(2) planned injections = planned withdrawals.

I think you were trying to do the second method (though I think you wrote W where you should have had J, ie Y=Cd +J=Cd+W, which comes down to finding Y such that J=W).

Using (1) as the examiners have done:

Agg demand = Agg supply (output=GDP=Y)
C+I+G+X-M = Y
100+0.75Yd +45+80+40 -30-0.1Y = Y
235 +0.75Yd-0.1Y = Y
235+0.75(Y-T+R)-0.1Y = Y
235+0.75(Y-20-0.2Y+40)-0.1Y = Y
235+0.75(20+0.8Y)-0.1Y = Y
235+15+0.6Y-0.1Y = Y
250+0.5Y = Y
So Ye = 500.

Using (2) J=W, which is probably harder in this case:

J = I+G+X = 45+80+30 = 165

W = S+T*+M where T* = T-R
S = Y-C=Y-(100+0.75Yd) = -100+0.25Yd
= -100+0.25(Y-T+R) = -100+0.25(20+0.8Y)
= -100+5+0.2Y = -95+0.2Y
T*= 20+0.2Y-40 = -20+0.2Y
M = 30+0.1Y
So W =-95+0.2Y-20+0.2Y+30+0.1Y = -85+0.5Y

So setting J=W
165 = -85+0.5Y
250 = 0.5Y
Ye = 250

This is really nasty and I hope the examiners won't ask anything as difficult as this one!
 
waho nice work!!
Thanks a lot for detailed explanation.
In general, if the equilibrium is not there and Planned injections is not equal to planned withdrawls
Y=Cd+W
E=Cd+J
Am I correct? That is the reason I tried writing Y=Cd+W
 
I'm not sure what you mean by equilibrium not being there.

You usually have to find equilibrium by either of the two methods:

1. aggregate demand (E) = aggregate supply (Y)
2. planned injections (J) = planned withdrawals (W)

These two are equivalent since:

aggregate demand (E) = C+I+G+X-M = Cd +J
income (Y) = Cd +S+T+M = Cd + W

So setting E = Y is the same as setting Cd +J = Cd + W, ie J =W.

So what you have said, ( ie Y = Cd + W and E = Cd +J ) is correct but you won't find equilibrium by using one of these equations; you have to put the two equations together.
 
Back
Top